|
IPST has been recognized as the fifth most innovative institution
in the nation. The Research Foundation of State University of
New York, taking data from a survey of 250 of the top research
institutions in the U.S. by the Association of University Technology
Managers (AUTM), ranked the Institute of Paper Science and Technology
as the fifth most innovative institution in the country. IPST
was ranked higher in the standings than MIT, Georgia Tech, Stanford,
and Princeton. The rankings were based on the number of patents
produced within an institution as a factor of the number of faculty
at the institution.
The Institute, from its beginning
in 1929, was created to provide basic research for the
paper industry. The Institute was instrumental in moving
the paper industry from an art to a science. Scientists
with expertise in physics, engineering, biology, and
chemistry researched major industry issues, and for the
first time, explained the scientific intricacies of how
paper is made.
The method in which technology is
transferred to industry and the role of the research
institution have changed in recent years. It used to
be that research institutions did fundamental research,
they published their findings in journals, and the industry
read those journals and commercialized what they thought
was valid. Today, companies do not depend on journal
articles for their breakthroughs; they want innovations
delivered to them as a finished product. Specifically,
with the rapid change in the paper industry and the downsizing
of R&D in individual companies, the Institute is expected
to do more to deliver a complete package to our constituents.
Dr. Gary Baum said, "We decided back
in 1996 to add technology transfer as a new mission for
IPST, and it is now finally paying off. This ranking
means that we have been diligent in capturing intellectual
property for the benefit of our member companies." In
contrast to the Institute of earlier years, IPST now
aggressively seeks patents to protect intellectual property.
Under the new Dues-Funded Research Consortium (DFRC)
model, when patented technologies are subsequently licensed
to third parties, IPST negotiates a nonexclusive royalty-free
right for our members to use the technology.
The transfer of IPST-developed technology
to our members and the industry for commercial use has
always been of the highest importance to the Institute.
Our new Technology Transfer Mission and the DFRC model,
together with our increased focus on delivering value
to customers, have led to some significant changes in
how we conduct the business of Technology Transfer. There
are currently seven license agreements, and our portfolio
of IPST technologies licensed to supplier companies continues
to grow. The Institute has produced 152 patents since
its founding in 1929, 23 of those have been produced
since 1995. The current number of pending patent applications
is 45. In 1999, we licensed our first start-up company,
Fluidix Microforming Systems, Inc., to commercialize
the forming technology developed by IPST faculty inventor
Dr. Cyrus Aidun.
"I'm quite pleased that the Institute
of Paper Science and Technology ranked so high among
other research institutions like MIT and Georgia Tech," said
Dr. Jim Ferris, IPST's President. "I think that the ranking
reflects well upon the fine researchers that we have
at IPST and the value that we give to the pulp and paper
industry."
| 1998 Rank |
U.S. Universities & Research
Institutions |
Ratio Inventions/100
Faculty |
Ratio Patents/100
Faculty |
Ratio Patents/
Inventions |
| 1 |
California Institute
of Technology (CAL TECH) |
106.8 |
65.4 |
0.6 |
| 2 |
St. Elizabeth's Medical
Center of Boston |
64.3 |
35.7 |
0.6 |
| 3 |
Oklahoma Medical
Research Foundation |
46.7 |
50.0 |
1.1 |
| 4 |
Salk Institute |
36.4 |
58.2 |
1.6 |
| 5 |
Institute of Paper
Science and Technology (IPST) |
30.6 |
28.6 |
0.9 |
| 6 |
Massachusetts Institute
of Technology (MIT) |
21.0 |
21.0 |
1.0 |
| 7 |
Georgia Institute
of Technology (GT) |
17.1 |
13.7 |
0.8 |
| 8 |
Stanford University |
16.1 |
15.3 |
0.9 |
| 9 |
Cleveland Clinic
Foundation |
15.3 |
3.2 |
0.2 |
| 10 |
University of Maryland,
Baltimore |
15.1 |
12.5 |
0.8 |
|
Data
compiled by The Research Foundation of State
University of New York, Raw data from the AUTM
Licensing Survey 1998; faculty counts from
U.S. News & World Report charts. Ratios and
other calculations copyright © 2000, Technology
Access, Omission of an institution may simply
be due to lack of faculty counts or other data.
|
For more information contact David
Bell at David.Bell@ipst.gatech.edu.
|