IPST and Georgia Tech Consider
Joining Forces |
Portions of this article were provided by
Bob Harty, GIT Institute Communications and Public Affairs
ATLANTA, GA, November 30, 2001-- Jim
Ferris, President of the Institute of Paper Science and
Technology [IPST], recently announced that the Institute
was studying the possibility of merging with Georgia
Institute of Technology [GIT]. The growing relationships
between IPST and Georgia Tech and changes within the
paper industry led to discussions about the wisdom of
considering an alternative structure for the relationship
between the two institutions. Dr. Ferris explains, "IPST
has been a private graduate school since 1929 with a
long and proud history of service to, and support from,
the U.S. paper industry. However, our industry is going
through unprecedented change brought on by rapid consolidation
and globalization. Of the 53 member companies that supported
IPST in 1998, fifteen have been involved in a merger
and another four are currently in the final process of
merging. Most every merger reduces the future revenue
of the Institute and we expect the rate of mergers to
continue or increase further. As a result, the IPST Board
of Trustees has asked us to explore the potential for
merging IPST with Georgia Tech."
The study of a possible merger has
been sanctioned by the Chancellor of the University System
of Georgia and the Board of Trustees of IPST. In response
to this directive, an IPST/Georgia Tech task force to
study the merger option has been created to consider
issues that would have to be resolved, and recommend
a proposed framework that would lead to long-term success
for an IPST within Georgia Tech. Chaired by Charles Liotta,
vice provost for Research and dean of Graduate Studies
at GIT, the task force will include faculty and administrators
from both Institutions.
'No decision has been made at this
point,' said Liotta. 'There are numerous issues to consider
in this potential arrangement. Our goal is to understand
if it makes sense from an academic and financial point
of view and make a recommendation to both presidents
on whether or not to proceed. If the recommendation is
to proceed, we must also make a recommendation on timing.'
Dr. Ferris says, "The financial
support available from the state is significant but not
that sizeable. State support will take its place alongside
all the other revenue enhancement initiatives developed
through the Pathways program last year. All of them will
be important to our financial outlook. However, I believe
there is potentially a far more important aspect of this
proposal. That is, the improved ability of the new IPST
to put in place research consortia that involve advanced
technology areas such as nanotechnology, biotechnology,
or microelectronics. The solutions to many of the problems
facing this industry will be found outside the traditional
papermaking technologies in which we excel. These solutions
will be found at the interface of papermaking technologies
and these more advanced technologies. If we do merge
with GIT, our ability to focus these new technologies
on paper industry issues will be greatly enhanced."
The group hopes to conclude its study
by early 2002.
|